OT: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption

[Mike McCarty]

Craig White wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 17:29 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:

[snip]

>>I hope that wasn't too turgid.
> 
> ----
> not at all and IANAP so you clearly know more about this than I but I
> thought 'link' only applied if it were statically linked and thus, a
> driver file itself didn't represent an infringement of GPL/LGPL
> licenses, only the manner which they were used might be.

Read my other message. It explains things in a little more
detail.

Mike
-- 
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!