Automatic update
David Boles
dgboles at comcast.net
Thu Feb 16 17:49:13 UTC 2006
Christofer C. Bell wrote:
> On 2/12/06, Paul Michael Reilly <pmr at pajato.com> wrote:
>> So my
>> question is: why has the Redhat/Fedora update facility fallen into
>> such disrepair? And is there any reason to expect that it will become
>> competitive with Microsoft's with FC5 and follow ons?. It would be
>> unfortunate to hear that the answer is Redhat Enterprise versions. I
>> don't mind paying but I do mind running stale software. I'll pay
>> gladly to live on the bleeding edge. Even the lack of Firefox 1.5 with
>> FC4 is disturbing, enough to make me wonder what all the fuss over
>> Ubuntu is all about.
>
> a.) It hasn't fallen into "such disrepair."
> b.) If you think Fedora isn't "bleeding edge" then you shouldn't be
> running Linux at all (it doesn't get much more "bleeding edge.")
> c.) If your complaint is solely due to Firefox 1.5 not being out the
> door on Fedora yet, go away and stop trolling.
>
> --
> Chris
>
> "I trust the Democrats to take away my money, which I can afford. I
> trust the Republicans to take away my freedom, which I cannot."
>
Firefox 1.5 for FC-4 is available. As is Thunderbird 1.5. But you have to make
the effort to look for it. Do you know how to use Google?
--
David
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list