ref: Microsoft barriers to Linux adoption on the desktop
Robin Laing
Robin.Laing at drdc-rddc.gc.ca
Thu Feb 16 22:06:36 UTC 2006
Jeff Vian wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 08:37 -0700, Robin Laing wrote:
>
>>Mike McCarty wrote:
>>
>>>Guy Fraser wrote:
>>>
>>>[I wrote]
>>
>>>
>>>>As far as I know, the 80386 was the first processor supported
>>>>by Linux, or BSD but I don't know. Back in those days, I
>>>
>>>
>>>What I said. MicroSoft products are better able to run
>>>on old hardware than Linux.
>>>
>>>You agree, so there's no need for further discussion.
>>>
>>>Mike
>>
>>But can these products be purchased today?
>>
>>For the record, was Linux even available before the 386? What was the
>>current processor available with Linux first came out? What was the
>>current microsoft product.
>>
>>You also cannot compare Linux to DOS. It was more than DOS from day
>>one so it is an unfair comparison.
>
>
> The first Linux kernel was availablew in late 1991. The 386 was already
> out by then and IIRC the 486 came out by 1993 and the Pentium by 1995.
> I first used RedHat 4.0 with the 1.3.XX kernel so that was the
> 486/Pentium days
>
> In fact, Linus email where he announced the kernel running was dated
> August 25, 1991 and it says the kernel was written on the 386.
>
> The history for Linux gives this in the release notes for the 0.01
> kernel.
> Hardware needed for running linux:
> - 386 AT
> - VGA/EGA screen
> - AT-type harddisk controller (IDE is fine)
> - Finnish keyboard (oh, you can use a US keyboard, but not
> without some practise :-)
>
>
>
>
>
>>--
>>Robin Laing
>>
>
>
This is the point. DOS was written before Linux existed so it will
run on previous devices. Heck I still have an unused 4004 chip at
home and I wonder if DOS would run on that? How about a VIC 20?
My point is Linux won't run on a 286 or 8080 because it was never
designed to run on that. It is also an interesting history lesson.
I used Linux in 1993 for the first time on a P90. I also used CP/M on
a Z80 processor.
DOS and Linux do two different things. DOS isn't a
multi-user/multi-threaded OS. Linux was from day one. Of course
Linux will need more resources but as a basic system it will do more
than DOS. Of course, you can look at the Tiny Linux stuff that it
going on.
--
Robin Laing
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list