AppArmour open sourced. Possible inclusion in Fedora?
John Summerfied
debian at herakles.homelinux.org
Tue Jan 17 20:27:13 UTC 2006
Dave Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 12:14:58PM -0500, Adam Gibson wrote:
> > http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060113-5975.html
> >
> > From all the reading I have done it seems that configuration would be
> > much easier for most system admins. A utility can learn what access is
> > needed by monitoring the app so that you don't have to know all the
> > details of what the app touches to get it working for new apps.
>
> For one thing it needs kernel patches that aren't upstream, which makes
> it unlikely. Given it duplicates a subset of SELinux functionality,
> it seems somewhat pointless to divide our efforts on two solutions
> to the same problem instead of improving the one that upstream has
> already chosen.
If Red Hatters are monitoring the opposition, they will already know
about AppArmour.
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
1aaaaaaa at computerdatasafe.com.au Z1aaaaaaa at computerdatasafe.com.au
Tourist pics http://portgeographe.environmentaldisasters.cds.merseine.nu/
do not reply off-list
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list