Fedora Core 3 Transferred to Fedora Legacy
akonstam at trinity.edu
akonstam at trinity.edu
Tue Jan 17 22:01:33 UTC 2006
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 10:27:34AM -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
> akonstam at trinity.edu wrote:
> >
> >Well I guess all this is a matter of opinion. To me the response to a
> >complaint of "that is how we always did it" is puerile. You seem to be
> >the redhat representative in this discussion it seems to me you could
> >spend some of your time communicating to the "powers" about our
> >feelings than just defending the decision blindly.
>
> It doesn't seem to me that this is what Rahul is doing. He's pointing
> out that this is not the right forum. His claim (IIUI) is that the
> people who need to see these messages for the most part don't take
> time to read this forum. He's suggested a place to post where they
> do read, so...
>
> >After all your explanations I can't understand why it would hurt
> >anything or anyone to delay the movement of FC3 to legacy until after
> >FC5 release. People in the "community" are saying that this decision
> >makes it more difficult for them.
> >
> >This follows multiple decisions the RedHat has made that the list
> >members have felt was wrong and not once have I detected a willingness
> >on Red Hat's part to reconsider the decision.
>
> Did you put any of your concerns where Rahul said they would have
> effect?
>
Ok, I can take a hint.
--
=======================================================================
Individualists unite!
-------------------------------------------
Aaron Konstam
Computer Science
Trinity University
telephone: (210)-999-7484
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list