Fedora Core 3 Transferred to Fedora Legacy
John Summerfied
debian at herakles.homelinux.org
Tue Jan 17 22:55:08 UTC 2006
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 15:34, John Summerfied wrote:
>
>
>>The current policy of retiring an FC release immediately _before_ the
>>release of the second subsequent release seems completely bizarre to me.
>
>
> It is really in no one's best interest to have developers wasting
> their time backporting fixes and updates into an old distribution.
If Rahul is right there aren't any, so the workload won't be great. If
he's wrong (as I expect) there won't be many, and still thr workload's
not great.
> If you want updates, everyone is better off if you move on to the
> next version, and a policy that encourages this makes a lot of
> sense. In theory, FC4 should be very well tested and reliable by
> now and FC5 should be usable if you don't mind a surprise or two.
I'm content to move to FC5, but it's not even released yet, and that is
the point of the argument.
> It is also next to no trouble to update your yum configuration
> to pull from the legacy repository (much less than complaining
> about it...). My only concern in this issue is for the large
If FP listens, then it can solve the problem for a lot more than one
person for a lot more (we hope) than one release.
Any time anyone makes any changes to any file, there is some likelihood
of getting it wrong, and if a hundred people make changes to their own
copies, then its almost certain that someone will do exactly that.
> number of machines whose administrators don't watch the mail list
> and won't be aware of the need to change. When the next security
> problem and fix come around they won't get the fix even if they
> continue to run their updates.
There is that too.
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
1aaaaaaa at computerdatasafe.com.au Z1aaaaaaa at computerdatasafe.com.au
Tourist pics http://portgeographe.environmentaldisasters.cds.merseine.nu/
do not reply off-list
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list