Fedora Core 3 Transferred to Fedora Legacy
Rahul Sundaram
sundaram at redhat.com
Sun Jan 22 15:45:43 UTC 2006
Jeff Spaleta wrote:
>On 1/22/06, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Nobody stopped anyone from doing the work involved. In fact it was
>>already done before. http://fedora.isphuset.no/
>>
>>
>
>
>I think the underlying frustration involving the re-spins is one of
>access and branding. You want it to be accessible for people having
>problems with the regular installer, but you don't want everyone
>assuming its an 'official' iso built by the normal release process.
>
>There is a lot more discussion that needs to happen to see how
>respins, which the core maintainers aren't responsible for, should be
>branded and should be talked about in easily accessible documentation.
>Discussion I was hoping the Foundation could take up at some point.
>Can a respin project get their own bugzilla component in the same
>bugzilla?
>
>
We need to discuss that if only the people who do the work would be
responsive to requests repeatedly.
>I keep forgetting to ping the http://fedora.isphuset.no/ guys to make
>sure they have written greg concerning trademark permission for the
>respins. It's an important usage case, which the trademark policy
>should try to explicitly address.
>
>-jef
>
>
I wrote to them on several occasions with no response whatsoever. Its
really disappointing.
--
Rahul
Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list