PSGML has incorrect RPM signature?!?

Thomas Springer th.springer at gmx.net
Mon Jan 9 23:02:26 UTC 2006


Am Montag, den 09.01.2006, 14:34 -0800 schrieb Dave Roberts:
> Either something got screwed up at Red Hat or somebody cracked
> something. Specifically, I'm trying to install PSGML via Yum on FC4. It
> looks like the PSGML is not signed with the correct Fedora key. I have
> verified the 0x4F2A6FD2 key as correct on the Fedora website, so it
> looks like all that is installed correctly. PSGML is apparently signed
> with a key ID of db42a60e. Here's the Yum console transcript.
[snip]

> warning: rpmts_HdrFromFdno: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID
> db42a60e
> public key not available for psgml-1.2.5-4.noarch.rpm
> Retrieving GPG key from file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora
> 
> The GPG key at file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora (0x4F2A6FD2)
> is already installed but is not the correct key for this package.
> Check that this is the correct key for the "Fedora Core 4 - i386 - Base"
> repository.
> 
> -- 
> Dave Roberts <ldave at droberts.com>
> 

This KeyId is used by Red Hat.

/etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY


Thomas
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20060110/316b3c1d/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the fedora-list mailing list