Fedora Core 3 Transferred to Fedora Legacy
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
Tue Jan 17 14:11:01 UTC 2006
On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 00:39, John Summerfied wrote:
> Whether the policy is the same as always is not the point. The point is
> that it's silly. It forces users to make untimely choices (such as go to
> a beta release) or to make needless choices and do needless work (such
> as reconfigure their updating software or install a soon-to-retire
> release) or to make unsafe choices (such as to use unmaintained software).
The simple fix for this would be for either the final FC3 update
to install a yum repository change so subsequent updates
would continue to come in from the legacy repo or just let
the legacy team take over maintenance of the existing repository
location - or make the existing repo mirror the legacy one.
Failing to do this is going to leave a huge number of machines
vulnerable to future security problems even if they had been
set up to do automatic updates. That's not a good thing for
a distribution's reputation. Letting the Fedora team change
focus as planned makes sense. Forcing all users to make a
manual configuration change in something that was supposed
to help them avoid manual work doesn't make sense.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list