'GPL encumbrance problems'
Mike McCarty
mike.mccarty at sbcglobal.net
Thu Jan 19 20:13:53 UTC 2006
David G. Miller (aka DaveAtFraud) wrote:
> It really does come down to a socialism vs. capitalism argument in the
> end. The pro [L]GPL crowd points to a claimed beneficial leveling
I said this a little differently in another e-mail...
[L]GPL is not really about software, it is about a social agenda.
Richard Stallman is some sort of socialist or communist, but without
much of a political agenda. His is more a social agenda.
[snip stuff I pretty much agree with]
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list