Fedora Core 3 Transferred to Fedora Legacy

[Rahul Sundaram]

Les Mikesell wrote:

>On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 12:15, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
>  
>
>>IMO the project should demo that its responsive to the users wishes in 
>>matters such as this.  To show that, we'd need to see support for the 
>>eye candy of our choice by rpms instead of being forced into a 
>>konstruct build, and a release install that actually worked, unlike the 
>>"official" FC4 debacle.  I'd imagine you would have many more running 
>>FC4 if the users could bring FC4.2 install glitches here, but we've 
>>been told pointedly we're on our own, so those cd's are still in my 
>>carry case, unused. 
>>    
>>
>
>Very good example.  What kind of community is it that can't
>be bothered to respin the official isos once in a while so the
>known-broken install on certain hardware gets fixed and the user
>that manages to install isn't immediately faced with a gig of
>update downloads just to get started?
>
Nobody stopped anyone from doing the work involved. In fact it was 
already done before. http://fedora.isphuset.no/


-- 
Rahul 

Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers