apache problem with soft link
Michael D. Berger
m.d.berger at ieee.org
Thu Jan 26 00:25:41 UTC 2006
>
> On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 18:08 -0500, Michael D. Berger wrote:
> > > Michael D. Berger wrote:
> > >
> > > > The strangest thing is that the problem is critically
> > > > dependent on the soft link name. I have tried numerous
> > > > combinations, and can make no sense of it. For example:
> > >
> > > It does sound like Selinux like Gordon said. Look at the
> > > links and the
> > > target dirs through "selinux eyes" with
> > >
> > > ls -lZ blah
> > >
> > > to see if there is anything in common with the good ones
> and the bad
> > > ones whatever the name.
> > >
> > > -Andy
> >
> > As excellent suggestion. I read the books about a year
> ago, and decided
> > that at this point I did not need selinux, so I deselected it on
> > installation. (Is there some way I could confirm this?)
>
> Try running "getenforce". It'll tell you whether SELinux is enforcing,
> permissive, or disabled.
>
> Paul.
>
Thanks, just what I needed. The answer is "Disabled". I am very
impressed with selinux, but on the install procedure, I think there
should be a warning that anyone who selects it, better know something
about it.
Mike.
--
Michael D. Berger
m.d.berger at ieee.org
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list