dns question
Ed Greshko
Ed.Greshko at greshko.com
Tue Jun 6 03:30:25 UTC 2006
Don Russell wrote:
> I added some information to my named configuration so sendmail could
> resolve the reverse look up of the private LAN addresses.... or at least
> get an error quickly instead of timing out
>
> In order for this to work, I manually changed /etc/resolv.conf ,
> deleting the exisiting nameserver statements, and adding nameserver
> 127.0.0.1
>
> Works great.... UNTIL the network is restarted and the resolv.conf file
> is rewritten.... then the nameserver statements are back to the
> addresses from the ISP obtained via DHCP.
>
> So, for an interesting experiment, I reconfigured the dhcp server in my
> router (cisco) to not pass the ISP DNS addresses to my server, instead
> use 127.0.0.1
>
> Frankly, I wasn't expecting the server to be able to resolve any other
> addresses.... but it does....
>
> Why? Seems silly to be asking why something DOES work.... but I don't
> understand how it can be resolving names like google.com, ibm.com etc
> etc, when it was not told which dns servers to use, other than "ask
> yourself"....
>
> What am I missing? ;-)
In your named.conf do you have something like:
zone "." {
type hint;
file "named.root";
};
If so, you have told your DNS server what it needs to do.
--
There's a lot to be said for not saying a lot.
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list