only 11Mb/s with bcm43xx on F5?[Scanned]

[James Pifer]

> General note: scp is great for real-life use over unprotected networks.
> But because there is the overhead of encryption and decryption, scp can
> be limited by processor power at one end or the other of a link, rather
> than raw throughput (especially if the network card itself requires a
> lot of processor time to do its stuff). This means it's not the best
> choice for measuring anything other than scp throughput.

Good point. I did not take into consideration the wireless encryption
being done. Using ttcp I got these results:

11M  =  4.48 Mbit/sec +++
54M  =  8.68 Mbit/sec +++

On a regular 10/100 NIC I get 87.03 Mbit/sec +++

With or with encryption overhead that is significantly faster than the
wireless connection. 

Any ideas?

Thanks,
James