FC4 or FC5

Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
Tue Jun 13 21:00:16 UTC 2006


On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 15:11 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:

> > > Actually it is commercial vs GPL. [...]
> > The GPL specifically allows commercial redistribution. The
> > only restriction it contains is that the cost for a copy of
> > the source code cannot exceed the cost of the binaries sold.
> > t signed.
> > 
> Well having nothing else to do this morning I read the GPL license
> agreement. You can sell the binary code to someone.t that person now has
> equivalent rights to that code to those that you have. Therefore he can
> sell it also in competition with you if he wants.
> 
> He , however, can not include it in proprietary code that he has
> exclusive rights to sell.

Which makes an interesting paradox for the end users.  Each one
can do his own work to integrate GPL code and proprietary code
obtained separately to create his own derived work, but each is
prohibited by the GPL from sharing that work with others, even
if those other already have their own copy of the proprietary
part.

-- 
  Les Mikesell
   lesmikesell at gmail.com





More information about the fedora-list mailing list