FC4 or FC5

[BRUCE STANLEY]

Tim <ignored_mailbox at yahoo.com.au> wrote: On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 13:13 -0700, BRUCE STANLEY wrote:
> Hardware vendors are not going to develop  full functioning drivers
> and then release them to the open source community if this gives their
> competitors an insight as to how to compete against them.

If you really believe that licensing terms prevents a competitor from
grabbing their product, diagnosing it, then using whatever they think in
it is a good idea, you're deluding yourself.

All sorts of industries do that (rip a competitors product apart to see
what makes it tick).  Licensing makes it harder for them to directly
steal and use things.  If they can get caught, they can get held to the
license terms.  But with or without a license, they can manage to make
use of what information they glean, they've just got to be careful about
how they use it.

-- 
(Currently running FC4, occasionally trying FC5.)

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.
I read messages from the public lists.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list at redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

I worked in the Mini-Computer industry for several years until it went
belly up.   I know all about revers engineering.

The point is,  why should a hardware vendor give it's competitor an 
out right free lunch.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20060615/0bdb89f3/attachment-0001.htm>