MS-XP to internet via Linux -

[Paul Howarth]

On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 15:48 -0400, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> Paul Howarth wrote:
> > Bob Goodwin wrote:
> >>
> >> This computer [box1] runs FC-5 and has a wireless connection to the 
> >> internet via eth0, into a wireless bridge, to a wireless router 
> >> connected to a satellite receiver/modem.
> >>
> >> I also can exchange files via Samba on eth1,  with a Windows XP 
> >> computer [box5] which has no internet connection other than a 
> >> conventional modem which is now useless since I terminated my service 
> >> with AT&T Worldnet.  I don't often use the XP computer but I would 
> >> like to be able to update applications and sync the clock 
> >> occasionally.  I would like to connect it  to my ISP through this 
> >> computer to avoid buying yet another wireless adapter.
> >>
> >> I haven't had much luck "googling" but probably am not inputing the 
> >> right keywords.   Most of what I found was about connecting Linux via 
> >> a Windows box. Can anyone suggest where to look for 
> >> information/instructions on connecting an XP system via Linux?
> >
> > I'd set up the Linux box as a router/firewall using shorewall (which 
> > is in Extras).
> >
> > Here's a HOWTO:
> > http://www.shorewall.net/two-interface.htm
> >
> > Paul.
> >
> After looking at the shorewall diagrams I wonder if I could not 
> reconfigure my system.  Presently I have a Linksys WET54G wireless 
> bridge feeding this computer[box1] via eth0 and an old Linksys EZXS55W 
> 5-port ethernet switch connected to eth1 and some other computers 
> including the XP computer [box5]. 
> 
> What if I move the switch between the wireless bridge and this computer 
> [box1, eth0]. It seems I should be able to tie the XP box5 into one of 
> the four remaining ethernet ports on the switch and get both a route to 
> the internet and between boxes via Samba.  Before embarking on that 
> effort I would like more knowledgeable comment however.  I'm probably 
> getting in over my head but I usually manage to muddle through such 
> things eventually if they can be done.

You could do that and it would probably work. I personally prefer to
have my Windows boxes behind a Linux firewall, which is why I go for the
two-interface approach.

> I have been using Firestarter to setup the firewall for some time but 
> could probably manage with Shorewall if necessary.

I can't compare the two really; I've never used Firestarter but am very
happy with Shorewall.

Paul.