Ten Reasons To *NOT* Use ZFS:

[Gilboa Davara]

On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 22:07 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 20:52, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> > On 22Jun2006 09:21, Steven Ringwald <asric at asric.com> wrote:
> > | >Your points on licensing are the accurate and worth considering.  This 
> > | >could be the show stopper.
> > | 
> > | Isn't this why modules were introduced into the kernel???
> > 
> > No. Go look at the linux kernel folks opinions about binary-only modules.
> 
> Why is that relevant?
> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/source/
> 

You know the answer to that.
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/about/faq/licensing_faq/

...
I believe this covers it.
http://groups.google.co.il/group/linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/9726be571101d09/27036427257177ed?q=cddl&rnum=1#27036427257177ed

Gilboa