UOL Anti spam is back, again...

[Mike McCarty]

Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 02:18, Tim wrote:
> 
> 
>>I have no desire for private mail from a
>>public list (typically such things are by mistake, or because someone
>>wants to behave in a manner that wouldn't be tolerated in public),
> 
> 
> Well, no, it's because from the beginning internet mail lists
> used the sender's 'From:' and the replier was expected to
> 'reply all' if he wanted to include the list.  Some have
> since changed the list behavior but there is still a good
> argument that the original way was correct.  (The argument
> goes that you should expect email to be private and having
> a private message exposed in pubic is a worse problem than
> the reverse.)

[snip]

If it's an argument you want, they try this same discussion
over on Debian. :->

Mike
-- 
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!