From release notes for FC5T3 (web)
Andy Green
andy at warmcat.com
Tue Mar 7 17:12:45 UTC 2006
gb spam wrote:
> Perhaps you should check the list - it was "debated" at length there
> with all pro-choice arguments dismissed, sometimes with valid points,
> but often without valid points.
I do subscribe to it... what was the thread called? A quick search on
'everything' in the last 30 days in Thunderbird showed lots of posts but
not the magic thread as I could recognize it.
>> because that at least has the
>> possibility of convincing the people responsible for the code.
>
> Sadly not, anti-choice wouldn't listen to pro-choice. Their minds
> were already made up, and the change was presented as a fait accompli.
Ah well steady on, I could ask for a button that changes the installer
background colour and use the same generic "anti choice" complaint when
I was told where to stick my demand. Therefore it's not a useful
observation.
>> What should have happened differently?
>
> Well, its perfectly possible to make those that don't to use an option
> and those that do want to use an option happy. Perhaps that could
> have been considered?
I'll read the thread you mentioned if you can point me to it. Some day,
perhaps years from now, I likewise hope to convince someone about
something on that list, hell, any mailing list. Or Internet forum. Hm
in fact also living room.
-Andy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 4492 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20060307/d983e6f8/attachment-0001.bin>
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list