[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: routing VS nat: can FC3 just be a router between eth0 <-> ppp0 with no MASQ/NAT???



On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 12:26 -0500, James Pifer wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 06:52 -0500, James Pifer wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 15:09 +1100, Steffen Kluge wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 08:43 -0500, James Pifer wrote:
> > > > After I make the connection I do iptables -F so it's wide open
> > > 
> > > This flushes only the filter table.
> > > 
> > > > When I try to use the connection the machine is still doing NAT.
> > > 
> > > Check the nat table:
> > > # iptables -t nat -L
> > > 
> > > Cheers
> > > Steffen.
> > 
> > Yeah, it's doing MASQUERADE. Is there any way to turn that off so the
> > machine just acts like a router?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > James
> > 
> 
> I tried clearing the masquerade table, then clients can't reach the
> remote network. So the FC3 machine, with a connection to eth0 and ppp0,
> plus set to act as a router, does not appear to act as a router between
> eth0 and ppp0. 
> 
> Is it possible to make it be a router between eth0 and ppp0 without
> masquerade? Just be a router....
> 
> Thanks,
> James
> 

Forgive my stupid question, but does each of your machines inside your
LAN has a true IP address?

Gilboa


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]