dhcpd.conf question

Richard England rengland at europa.com
Mon Mar 13 00:21:13 UTC 2006


Craig White wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 17:26 -0600, Bob Hartung wrote:
>   
>> Hi all,
>>    I'm beginning to think that some of the dhcpd docs are wrong or 
>> perhaps I can't read.  I am trying to write a simple dhcpd.conf file for 
>> a machine with a single NIC.  This will assign a small subset of the 
>> 192.168.14.0 subnet for automatic assignment and will assign a fixed ip 
>> address to a small NAS appliance that I purchased.
>>
>> The code (below) fails on /etc/dhcpd start.  What did I miss?
>>
>> #
>> ddns-update-style      interim;
>> ignore client-updates;
>>
>> #subnet 192.168.14.0 netmask 255.255.255.0{
>>
>> #default-lease-time     600;
>> #max-lease-time       86400;
>>
>> #option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0;
>> #option domain-name-servers  204.127.203.135, 204.148.225.135;
>> #option routers     192.168.14.249;
>> #}
>>
>> subnet 192.168.14.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
>>     range 192.168.14.80 192.168.14.95;
>>     default-lease-time	600;
>>     max-lease-time     86400;
>>
>>     option domain-name-servers  xxx.yyy.zzz.rrr, xxx.ddd.ttt.ooo;
>>     option routers   192.168.14.249;
>>
>>     host simpleshare {
>> 	hardware ethernet 00:01:6c:bd:1d:90;
>>          fixed-address     192.168.14.96;
>>          option host-name  simpleshare;
>>     }
>> }
>>     
> ----
> from a brief look at it...a closing brace at the end...easier to notice
> these things if you follow an indentation structure more closely.
>
> Craig
>
>   
Where is the mis-match, exactly?  I count 3 opens and 3 closes. 3 sets.  
1 set is commented out and the other two are properly nested in the 
remainder.  Am I missing something?

--R
------------------------------------------------------------------------
/I got Freedom,...I got freedom in my code (FC3/FC4)/
Registered Unix <http://counter.li.org> user #409453




More information about the fedora-list mailing list