dhcpd.conf question
Richard England
rengland at europa.com
Mon Mar 13 00:21:13 UTC 2006
Craig White wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 17:26 -0600, Bob Hartung wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> I'm beginning to think that some of the dhcpd docs are wrong or
>> perhaps I can't read. I am trying to write a simple dhcpd.conf file for
>> a machine with a single NIC. This will assign a small subset of the
>> 192.168.14.0 subnet for automatic assignment and will assign a fixed ip
>> address to a small NAS appliance that I purchased.
>>
>> The code (below) fails on /etc/dhcpd start. What did I miss?
>>
>> #
>> ddns-update-style interim;
>> ignore client-updates;
>>
>> #subnet 192.168.14.0 netmask 255.255.255.0{
>>
>> #default-lease-time 600;
>> #max-lease-time 86400;
>>
>> #option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0;
>> #option domain-name-servers 204.127.203.135, 204.148.225.135;
>> #option routers 192.168.14.249;
>> #}
>>
>> subnet 192.168.14.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
>> range 192.168.14.80 192.168.14.95;
>> default-lease-time 600;
>> max-lease-time 86400;
>>
>> option domain-name-servers xxx.yyy.zzz.rrr, xxx.ddd.ttt.ooo;
>> option routers 192.168.14.249;
>>
>> host simpleshare {
>> hardware ethernet 00:01:6c:bd:1d:90;
>> fixed-address 192.168.14.96;
>> option host-name simpleshare;
>> }
>> }
>>
> ----
> from a brief look at it...a closing brace at the end...easier to notice
> these things if you follow an indentation structure more closely.
>
> Craig
>
>
Where is the mis-match, exactly? I count 3 opens and 3 closes. 3 sets.
1 set is commented out and the other two are properly nested in the
remainder. Am I missing something?
--R
------------------------------------------------------------------------
/I got Freedom,...I got freedom in my code (FC3/FC4)/
Registered Unix <http://counter.li.org> user #409453
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list