Delist this person: From: petsupermarket

[Mike McCarty]

Patrick wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 23:06 +1030, Tim wrote:
> 
>>On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 12:57 +0100, Patrick wrote:
>>
>>>I propose World+Dog is unsubscribed from the list, the mailinglist
>>>software is tweaked to address such problems and let everybody
>>>subscribe again.
>>
>>The trouble is that even if you did force everyone to resubscribe,
>>there's nothing stopping a spammer from doing so again.  Remember that
>>they're *receiving* messages from the list, but posting *directly* to
>>all the victims.  Any cretin can do that, and there's little a list
>>owner can do about that, unless they can figure out which subscriber is
>>the cretin, and that mayn't be possible.
> 
> 
> Reading also James Wilkinson's comments ("the list administrators tried
> putting per-subscriber data in the subject of a non-list e-mail sent to
> all subscribers, and got nothing back...") I understand now that this is

Err, I saw a list *member* try to do that, but not the list admins.
If the list admins would do that, then they could find out who did it.

[snip]

Mike
-- 
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!