SAMBA configuration - Machine name

[Mike McCarty]

Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> Sooo...
> 
> 1) Poke the hole for 137/udp
> 2) Update your iptables conf file
> 3) Double check that you have a share section for the resource your are
> requesting.
> 4) Restart the Samba server
> 5) Retest
> 6) (Just for shits and giggles) Try a longer name with only alpha
> numerics.
> 7) Take this issue up on the Samba list (where there is lots of
> expertise in dealing with whacked out antiquated versions of MS cruft).

Ok, I'm getting "access has been denied" when I do a

 > net view \\PRESARIO

Here's a piece of tcpdump on the Linux machine at the time...

23:48:00.386030 IP 172.17.205.79.netbios-ssn > amd586.47893: P 
70:109(39) ack 267 win 5840 NBT Packet
23:48:00.387265 IP amd586.47893 > 172.17.205.79.netbios-ssn: F 
267:267(0) ack 109 win 1450
23:48:00.414819 IP 172.17.205.79.netbios-ssn > amd586.47893: F 
109:109(0) ack 268 win 5840
23:48:00.416087 IP amd586.47893 > 172.17.205.79.netbios-ssn: . ack 109 
win 1450
23:48:00.615240 IP 172.17.205.79.netbios-ssn > amd586.47893: F 
109:109(0) ack 268 win 5840
23:48:00.616849 IP amd586.47893 > 172.17.205.79.netbios-ssn: . ack 110 
win 1450

I looked in /var/log/messages, and I found this...

Mar 16 23:47:41 Presario-1 kernel: device eth0 entered promiscuous mode
Mar 16 23:47:58 Presario-1 samba(pam_unix)[11773]: authentication 
failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=samba ruser= rhost=172.17.205.80 
user=jmccarty
Mar 16 23:48:00 Presario-1 smbd[11773]: [2006/03/16 23:48:00, 0] 
auth/pampass.c:smb_pam_passcheck(810)
Mar 16 23:48:00 Presario-1 smbd[11773]:   smb_pam_passcheck: PAM: 
smb_pam_auth failed - Rejecting User jmccarty !
Mar 16 23:48:12 Presario-1 kernel: device eth0 left promiscuous mode

It looks like I need some sort of password in there...

At least I'm getting kicked off! (Of my own machine!)

Mike
-- 
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!