Problems installing FC4 on Dell Optiplex GX620
Tim
ignored_mailbox at yahoo.com.au
Sun Mar 19 12:28:59 UTC 2006
Tim:
>> Now that's just laughable. I've yet to see one that I'd call stable.
>> If "Windows is stable", they'd all be stable. It's not. It's only
>> stable under some circumstances, ones I don't get to see. I won't
>> claim Fedora is any better, but I certainly won't agree with Windows
>> earning the monika of being stable.
>>
>> This must be some new definition of being "stable" that I'm not
>> familiar with.
Craig White:
> I find Windows XP pretty stable...probably more stable than FC-4 that
> I'm using on my desktop but that was an upgrade from FC-1 to FC-3 to
> FC-4 and I am gonna wipe it all out and install FC-5.
I don't find Windows XP even "fairly" stable, while I do find FC4 so
stable I can call it reliable. I'm reminded of a comment made while
studying electronics, about poor design: "The output will remain
constant, when adjusted to do so."
I find an awful lot of tinkering is *required* with XP, but FC4 pretty
much "just works", and keeps on doing so. And XP *still* hasn't gotten
out of that "reboot required after minor configuration change"
stupidity.
--
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.
I read messages from the public lists.
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list