Are Livna and FreshRPMS compatible?

Jeff Vian jvian10 at charter.net
Wed Mar 22 02:59:17 UTC 2006


On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 16:39 -0800, Florin Andrei wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 16:53 -0300, Mariano López Reta wrote:
> > 
> > I just wanted to know if I can have both installed so yum can search
> > both.
> 
> I know for a fact that Livna is compatible with Extras/Updates/Fedora.
> All other repos - I just download/install packages manually.
> 
Something is implicitly wrong with your statement of fact above.

Livna claims to be compatible with Extras.
Rpmforge claims to be compatible with Extras
It is a known fact that Livna and Rpmforge are not compatible.

Ergo one of the first two statements appears false.
I have used Rpmforge constantly and never encountered a conflict with
the Fedora Updates_released, Base, or Extras repos.  I wonder where
explicitly the fallacy in the claims lies.

> No, I lied - I do configure ATrpms in yum, but I disable it in the .repo
> file and, when I am using it, I add --enablerepo=atrpms to the yum
> parameters. I only install MythTV from ATrpms anyway, and nothing else.
> 
Like you I also pick/choose which packages to use from where.  I use
ATrpms and Livna selectively.

> -- 
> Florin Andrei
> 
> http://florin.myip.org/
> 




More information about the fedora-list mailing list