reiserfs && fc5? boot options?

[Alexander Dalloz]

Am Do, den 23.03.2006 schrieb Danny Ciarniello um 17:24:
> Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> 
> >Am Mi, den 22.03.2006 schrieb Kahn Seidl um 19:58:

> >>Is it still the same process for reiserfs and linux?
> >>
> >>to just boot linux reiserfs?
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >Yes.
> >  
> >
> No.  At least, I had no end of problems doing this.  Use linux selinux=0 
> reiserfs instead.  Also, you may need to boot to rescue and modify 
> /boot/grub/grub.conf and /etc/fstab after the initial installation.  See 
> http://fedoraforum.org/forum/showthread.php?t=99462 for all the gory 
> details.
> 
> Mind you, there may be partition schemes where the problems that I 
> encountered won't happen.
> 
> Dan.
> 
> >http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AnacondaOptions
> > 6. MYTH - Fedora should use an alternative default filesystem

Sorry, that was a wrong URL pasted. Correct one is:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraMyths
6. MYTH

As reiserfs still isn't officially supported as a filesystem during
install problems like with SELinux may occur. This is what the Wiki
says.

Alexander


-- 
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773
legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html
Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.35_FC2smp 
Serendipity 22:07:15 up 9 days, 23:55, load average: 0.25, 0.17, 0.18 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20060324/b398911b/attachment-0001.sig>