Tape Drive

Tue Mar 28 23:22:15 UTC 2006

I just want to get the tape drive working to do simple backups.....I am
a newbie at this linux so please bear with me....are the apps.hard to
configure? or should I stick with tar? Thanks for the help!

Thomas Allen
Northampton Community College
LAN Support Specialist
TAllen at northampton.edu
(610) 861-5522  
>>> fedora-list-request at redhat.com 03/28/06 5:53 PM >>>
Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to
	fedora-list at redhat.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	fedora-list-request at redhat.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
	fedora-list-owner at redhat.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..."

Today's Topics:

   1. Re: OFF LIST: Re: fc5: install everything? (Mike McCarty)
   2. Re: Destination host unreachable (Neil Cherry)
   3. Re: OFF LIST: Re: fc5: install everything? (Craig White)
   4. Re: Gmail Thunderbird Configuration (Neil Cherry)
   5. Re: why is FC5 still compiled at -O2 (Jack Howarth)
   6. Re: fedora-list Digest, Vol 25, Issue 348 (Thomas Allen)
   7. Re: Oh....rats.... screensaver activates itself (Jim Cornette)
   8. Re: The pet supermarket relay? (Craig White)
   9. Fedora C4 dies (Jim Douglas)
  10. [OT] Re: FC5 nforce4 sata initrd problems [for geeks??]
      (Wieslaw Kierbedz)
  11. Re: My Epson scanner now works - without USB 2 (David Fletcher)
  12. Re: fedora-list Digest, Vol 25, Issue 348 (Craig White)
  13. Re: Fedora C4 dies (Jaysen B. Johnson)
  14. Re: system startup + cryptsetup (Marc Schwartz)
  15. Re: floaty around pointer in firefox (William Yardley)
  16. yum: /usr/lib/libmp3lame.so.0 is not a symbolic link (Nat Gross)
  17. Re: yum: /usr/lib/libmp3lame.so.0 is not a symbolic link
      (Nat Gross)
  18. Re: Fedora C4 dies (alan)
  19. Boot Loader Recovery (M.K)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 15:51:19 -0600
From: Mike McCarty <Mike.McCarty at sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: OFF LIST: Re: fc5: install everything?
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID: <4429AFD7.5020403 at sbcglobal.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Mike McCarty wrote:
> Craig White wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 15:47 -0500, Claude Jones wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue March 28 2006 15:29, Jim Cornette wrote:
>>>
>>>> The everything install is not really missing. The choice is a
>>>> few clicks away vs. one button to pull in all packages
>>>> available in core.
>>>
>>>
>>> After kicking up a big fuss over this, I now pretty much agree with 
>>> you. Any time lost by having to click through several extra menus is

>>> offset by the time saved by not having to deal with the issues that 
>>> were created by the old "everything" button, after the installation.

>>
>>
>> ----
>> gee...you got pretty po'd at me about this topic too.
>>
>> ;-)
>>
>> I give you credit for changing your mind.
>>
>> Craig
>>
> 
> That was such a polite nice reply, I have to comment.
> 
> Well done, Craig.
> 
> BTW, how are things over on CentOS?
> 
> Mike

Oh,well, even ON the list! :-)

Mike
-- 

p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 16:54:26 -0500
From: Neil Cherry <ncherry at comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Destination host unreachable
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID: <4429B092.30503 at comcast.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed

Colin Paul Adams wrote:

> I tried reseating the card - still no joy.
> 
> So maybe that card has failed, although how it can do so I'm not sure.

Do you have this machine connected to another machine directly? If
so do you have a cross-over cable between them?

If you have a true ne2000 clone (an old ISA card?) then it's
10M/Half duplex. If it's a PCI card and it's old, it *may* be
10M/Half duplex. If it's not old then it can support 10/100 -
half/full duplex.

-- 

Linux Home Automation         Neil Cherry       ncherry at linuxha.com
http://www.linuxha.com/                         Main site
http://linuxha.blogspot.com/                    My HA Blog
http://home.comcast.net/~ncherry/               Backup site

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 14:55:47 -0700
From: Craig White <craigwhite at azapple.com>
Subject: Re: OFF LIST: Re: fc5: install everything?
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1143582947.18511.146.camel at lin-workstation.azapple.com>
Content-Type: text/plain

On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 15:50 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
> Craig White wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 15:47 -0500, Claude Jones wrote:
> > 
> >>On Tue March 28 2006 15:29, Jim Cornette wrote:
> >>
> >>>The everything install is not really missing. The choice is a
> >>>few clicks away vs. one button to pull in all packages
> >>>available in core.
> >>
> >>After kicking up a big fuss over this, I now pretty much agree 
> >>with you. Any time lost by having to click through several extra 
> >>menus is offset by the time saved by not having to deal with the 
> >>issues that were created by the old "everything" button, after 
> >>the installation. 
> > 
> > ----
> > gee...you got pretty po'd at me about this topic too.
> > 
> > ;-)
> > 
> > I give you credit for changing your mind.
> > 
> > Craig
> > 
> 
> That was such a polite nice reply, I have to comment.
> 
> Well done, Craig.
> 
> BTW, how are things over on CentOS?
----
pretty calm - needs your deft cynicism   ;-)

Craig

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 17:03:37 -0500
From: Neil Cherry <ncherry at comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Gmail Thunderbird Configuration
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID: <4429B2B9.4050907 at comcast.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Ali Helmy wrote:
> Hey...
> 
> I tried
> [ahelmy at Laptop ~]$ telnet pop.gmail.com <http://pop.gmail.com> 995
> Trying 1.0.0.0...
> 
> and that is what i got... but why is it that my dns isnt working? it 
> works with everything else!

1) Don't top post (posting on top of a message like you've been
    doing) instead add you comments in the message like I'm doing

2) Did you really get 1.0.0.0? Or did you change that? If you got
    1.0.0.0 then your ISP is playing games. Instead try 66.249.83.109
    instead of pop.gmail.com and 66.249.83.111 instead of
    smtp.gmail.com

-- 
Linux Home Automation         Neil Cherry       ncherry at linuxha.com
http://www.linuxha.com/                         Main site
http://linuxha.blogspot.com/                    My HA Blog
http://home.comcast.net/~ncherry/               Backup site

------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 17:04:15 -0500 (EST)
From: howarth at bromo.msbb.uc.edu (Jack Howarth)
Subject: Re: why is FC5 still compiled at -O2
To: fedora-list at redhat.com
Message-ID: <20060328220415.6709C11003E at bromo.msbb.uc.edu>

    Actually building with -Os isn't all that odd. I read sometime ago
that MacOS X is actually built at the -Os optimization level. Now
whether
or not that makes as much sense on architectures other than powerpc, I
don't know.
               Jack

------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 17:08:28 -0500
From: "Thomas Allen" <tallen at northampton.edu>
Subject: Re: fedora-list Digest, Vol 25, Issue 348
To: <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID: <s4296da6.042 at gwmail.northampton.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

The tape drive that i HAVE IS A atapi Seagate STT20000A 20gig travan
drive. Not sure how to get this to work.....When I type dmesg I get the
following:
Probing IDE interface ide0...
hda: WDC WD200EB-00BHF0, ATA DISK drive
hdb: SONY CDU4811, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
Probing IDE interface ide1...
hdc: Seagate STT20000A, ATAPI TAPE drive
ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15
hda: max request size: 128KiB
hda: 39102336 sectors (20020 MB) w/2048KiB Cache, CHS=38792/16/63,
UDMA(66)
hda: cache flushes not supported
 hda: hda1 hda2
hdb: ATAPI 48X CD-ROM drive, 120kB Cache, UDMA(33)
Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.20
ide-floppy driver 0.99.newide

any ideas?

------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 17:12:27 -0500
From: Jim Cornette <fc-cornette at insight.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Oh....rats.... screensaver activates itself
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID: <4429B4CB.3000006 at insight.rr.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Tom Killian wrote:
>> gnome-screensaver should be located under the System > Preferences >
>> Screensaver menu selection. I believe you can select to disable the
>> screensaver, stop it from locking the desktop and the like from
there.
> 
> Does anyone know a way of doing this through a script?  It would be
> nice if mplayer, for example, could disable and then restore the
> screen saver.
> 

I watched a movie using xine and xscreensaver-base where the screensaver

never kicked in except when I paused the DVD for a bit to do something.

gnome-screensaver is said to take advantage of the message bus. I don't 
see why the screensaver cannot read video memory, differentiate between 
  the video content a minute or two earlier, if checksum is the same, 
engage, otherwise do nothing at all.

Jim

------------------------------

Message: 8
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 15:12:32 -0700
From: Craig White <craigwhite at azapple.com>
Subject: Re: The pet supermarket relay?
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1143583953.18511.160.camel at lin-workstation.azapple.com>
Content-Type: text/plain

On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 15:49 -0600, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, Gene Heskett wrote:
> 
> > On Tuesday 28 March 2006 14:47, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> > >There is at least one other possibility.
> > >The list server places its own address in the From header.
> > >Challenges come only to the server which ignores them.
> > >Presumably the orginal sender's address
> > >could be put in some other header line.
> >
> > What other line?  That %$#@&^ spambot strips it all.
> 
> That %$#@&^ spambot won't strip anything sent
> from the server to the list subscribers.
> That %$#@&^ spambot would be sending its
> garbage to the server which would ignore it.
> Neither the subscribers nor their mail servers
> would see the garbage from that %$#@&^ spambot.
----
New Rules # with deference if not admiration to Bill Maher...

Those who wish to offer better solutions to the problem that is
described at the following link...

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UOL

NEW RULE UOL#1
If their solution is intended for the list manager...please email the
list manager directly and not waste his time on the list...the list
manager's name is 
Warren Togami
  and his email address is 
togami AT redhat.com

NEW RULE UOL#2
If their solution is intended for users on how better to filter than the
suggestions on that page, please email the author of that page. His name
is Patrick Barnes
  and his email address is
nman64 AT n-man.com

And if you still insist on pissing in the wind by offering further
aolutions then:

NEW RULE UOL#3
You MUST acknowledge that you have read the wiki page in your first
sentence AND state that your knowledge exceeds the knowledge offers a
better understanding of the problem and the solution than is offered on
that wiki page.

of course, I can't make new rules nor enforce them, nor would I wish to
enforce them...but the point of this should be abundantly clear. No
amount of discussion on this list is gonna stop it from occurring. 

;-)

Craig

------------------------------

Message: 9
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 22:17:30 +0000
From: "Jim Douglas" <jdz99 at hotmail.com>
Subject: Fedora C4 dies
To: fedora-list at redhat.com
Message-ID: <BAY110-F346E7EE751EF24A1CF1A70BBD30 at phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed

Fedora freezes and I'm not sure why

Here are the symptoms.

Things slow down over the course of 2-4 minutes then I can't do anything
and 
have to turn the power off or if I'm lucky I can get to the terminal
window 
and shutdown.

It's only been happening the last couple of days and I don't know why.

Jim

------------------------------

Message: 10
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 00:20:32 +0200
From: Wieslaw Kierbedz <WieslawKierbedz at farba.eu.org>
Subject: [OT] Re: FC5 nforce4 sata initrd problems [for geeks??]
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID: <4429B6B0.7060109 at farba.eu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2

Wieslaw Kierbedz napisa*(a):
>
> I'am going to try gentoo's grub then.
>
>   
That is it.
FC does not like lilo.
It looks like /boot must be mounted to start system.
Grub is solution.
I had to disable selinux - it stopped many services.
Maybe I should to add some more boot option?
Thanks for advices.
Is there some tool with gui to use external repos?

-- 
WK
Wypusty:
ftp://farba.eu.org/pub/linux/arts/

------------------------------

Message: 11
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 23:24:33 +0100
From: David Fletcher <fc at fletchersweb.net>
Subject: Re: My Epson scanner now works - without USB 2
To: fedora-list at redhat.com
Message-ID: <200603282324.33828.fc at fletchersweb.net>
Content-Type: text/plain;  charset="utf-8"

On Tuesday 28 Mar 2006 18:29, Jeff Vian wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 18:03 +0100, James Wilkinson wrote:
>
> Some boards have different speed ports at different locations.
> I have seen some with a pair of 1.1 ports and a pair of 2.0 ports on
the
> back, and depending on which motherboard connector you used for the
> front panel connectors you could also get different speeds there.
> Most of the newer boards are at least consistent with having all 2.0
> ports and most newer cases are all 2.0 compliant.
>
> Some older cases had front panel connectors that were built with 1.1
> standards and may not be capable of running 2.0 so if they try it
causes
> errors.  Sometimes the ability to handle high speed devices is bios
> dependent as well.
>

I know that the front panel connectors switch from USB 2.0 to USB 1.1 as
a 
BIOS setting. I've copied a 100MB file from a USB flash drive and the 
difference is evident.

Also it's the same USB socket with the same cable that works in one mode
and 
not the other.

Dave F

-- 
Registered Linux user number 393408

I use and recommend the email service at 1 & 1
For domain registration, email and web hosting please visit:
http://oneandone.co.uk/xml/init?k_id=6389763

------------------------------

Message: 12
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 15:24:59 -0700
From: Craig White <craigwhite at azapple.com>
Subject: Re: fedora-list Digest, Vol 25, Issue 348
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1143584699.18511.170.camel at lin-workstation.azapple.com>
Content-Type: text/plain

On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 17:08 -0500, Thomas Allen wrote:
> The tape drive that i HAVE IS A atapi Seagate STT20000A 20gig travan
> drive. Not sure how to get this to work.....When I type dmesg I get
the
> following:
> Probing IDE interface ide0...
> hda: WDC WD200EB-00BHF0, ATA DISK drive
> hdb: SONY CDU4811, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
> ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
> Probing IDE interface ide1...
> hdc: Seagate STT20000A, ATAPI TAPE drive
> ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15
> hda: max request size: 128KiB
> hda: 39102336 sectors (20020 MB) w/2048KiB Cache, CHS=38792/16/63,
> UDMA(66)
> hda: cache flushes not supported
>  hda: hda1 hda2
> hdb: ATAPI 48X CD-ROM drive, 120kB Cache, UDMA(33)
> Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.20
> ide-floppy driver 0.99.newide
> 
> 
> any ideas?
----
about?

ide tape drives are known to be a pita to get working

you are probably gonna have to do do some searching in mt, perhaps make
a symlink to /dev/nst0

Were you looking to do tar/cpio type backups or did you intend to
install a full fledged application such as amanda or bacula?

I've only used SCSI tape drives, used amanda previously, am now playing
with bacula...both are very sophisticated and effective, neither are
easy to get started.

What is the question?

Craig

------------------------------

Message: 13
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 14:28:33 -0800 (PST)
From: "Jaysen B. Johnson" <jaysen at jaysentech.net>
Subject: Re: Fedora C4 dies
To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID:
	<43306.134.134.136.2.1143584913.squirrel at webmail.jaysentech.net>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1

How about provide some more information about your system?  Your
Operating
System for starters. (I am assuming Fedora Core 4).  What kind of
hardware
are you running? What programs do you run when this happens?  Does this
machine connect to the net or act as a gateway?

Your log files would be a great place to start. How about copy and paste
them in here.  Maybe a list of processes that you have running.

You say it's only been happening the last couple of days.  Is there
anything that you might have done to cause it such as add/removing
packages or changing any configuration files?   Any information that you
can provide will be of great help in assisting you.

Your initial email does not give enough information to even begin
troubleshooting.  Please provide the requested information and someone
will do their best to help you.

:-)

Jaysen

On Tue, March 28, 2006 14:17, Jim Douglas wrote:
> Fedora freezes and I'm not sure why
>
>
> Here are the symptoms.
>
>
> Things slow down over the course of 2-4 minutes then I can't do
anything
> and have to turn the power off or if I'm lucky I can get to the
terminal
> window and shutdown.
>
> It's only been happening the last couple of days and I don't know why.
>
>
> Jim
>
>
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list fedora-list at redhat.com To unsubscribe:
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>
>

-- 
Jaysen B. Johnson
System Administrator
http://www.jaysentech.net
jaysen at jaysentech.net

------------------------------

Message: 14
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 16:27:19 -0600
From: Marc Schwartz <MSchwartz at mn.rr.com>
Subject: Re: system startup + cryptsetup
To: fedora-list at redhat.com
Message-ID: <e0cd8a$8nr$1 at sea.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Gabor Walter wrote:
>> That modification should solve the problem by explicitly assigning
the
>> response to $answer. It will then be properly read in the 'case'
>> statement.
> 
> 
> That was it. Thanks a lot once again.

Happy to help.

> BTW, out of curiosity, did you modify /etc/fstab?  Just wondering
about
>> confirming new behavior, if any, in FC5, besides the LUKS changes to
>> gnome-mount, etc.
> 
> 
> Yes, I did make the modifications you suggested.

Ok. So at least for now, that part of the process is unchanged in FC5. 
Thanks for that.

> Another question. Is it necessary to explicitly unmount and close the
> encrypted partition at shutdown? I am thinking of sort of a "reversed
> luksopen'. Or will the system take care of it all?

I have not seen anything convincing to suggest that you need to 
explicitly unmount and close the mapped partition prior to shutdown. Of 
course with /home, the timing of that activity could be important.

As far as I have seen from comments (or the lack of them) elsewhere, the

system will unmount the device at shutdown and the device mapping is 
also lost at that time. I suppose that if for some reason, the shutdown 
were interrupted in some fashion at the proper point, there might be a 
window of opportunity for compromise of the system, but that seems like 
a low probability scenario for most users.

There was a discussion of what luksClose actually does on the list I 
reference below (ie. does it scrub the master key from memory, etc.), 
but there was never a reply, so it remains unclear, presumably save a 
read of the code.

I have seen comments about explicitly unmounting and closing when one is

using loopback devices rather than actual partitions, but since I don't 
use loopback devices, I have no personal experience with them.

If you want a verified answer from the experts, there is a dedicated 
e-mail list accessible via gmane's NNTP interface at:

http://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.device-mapper.dm-crypt

HTH,

Marc

------------------------------

Message: 15
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 14:38:35 -0800
From: William Yardley <fedora-list at veggiechinese.net>
Subject: Re: floaty around pointer in firefox
To: fedora-list at redhat.com
Message-ID: <20060328223835.GB19370 at mitch.veggiechinese.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 08:34:18PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Monday 27 March 2006 14:26, William Yardley wrote:

> > Since upgrading to FC5, Firefox (version 1.5) is showing a little
> > spinny thing around the pointer when a page is loading. Is this a
> > general Firefox thing, or a Fedora thing, and is there an option to
> > get rid of this behavior?

> Leave it be, thats the std busy indicator.  It will go away when the 
> page is loaded.

But it's ugly, and it's not "standard" to me, since Firefox is the only
application I use where it shows up. AFAICT, there's no way to turn it
off, and it seems to exist in all of the "themes" I tested (if it is,
indeed, based on the theme).

Not only that, but Firefox and Mozilla have their own status indicators,
both in the tab bar and in the bottom of the browser window. And the
normal X cursor has a little clock that shows up next to the pointer,
which is what /I/ would consider the "std" busy indicator.

Btw, removing the "redhat-artwork" RPM (along with some other random
gnome stuff) seemed to fix the problem (by getting rid of all the Gnome
themes).

w

------------------------------

Message: 16
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 17:42:42 -0500
From: "Nat Gross" <nat101l at gmail.com>
Subject: yum: /usr/lib/libmp3lame.so.0 is not a symbolic link
To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID:
	<cf66298c0603281442q5531cb18ka62575fc9e005273 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Recently I copied the lame lib to /usr/lib. (It solved whatever mp3
problem I had at the time.) Since then, yum complains
"/usr/lib/libmp3lame.so.0 is not a symbolic link".
Yum still works normally, but keeps bugging me with this message.
Where does this file belong? Do I need to create a sl to it (after
mv'ing it to its correct dir) in /usr/lib?
Thanks
nat

------------------------------

Message: 17
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 17:49:52 -0500
From: "Nat Gross" <nat101l at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: yum: /usr/lib/libmp3lame.so.0 is not a symbolic link
To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID:
	<cf66298c0603281449pc5eb698l28c056c3334e5744 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On 3/28/06, Nat Gross <nat101l at gmail.com> wrote:
> Recently I copied the lame lib to /usr/lib. (It solved whatever mp3
> problem I had at the time.) Since then, yum complains
> "/usr/lib/libmp3lame.so.0 is not a symbolic link".
> Yum still works normally, but keeps bugging me with this message.
> Where does this file belong? Do I need to create a sl to it (after
> mv'ing it to its correct dir) in /usr/lib?
> Thanks
> nat
>

woops. just notice the complete yum message:
/sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libmp3lame.so.0 is not a symbolic link

------------------------------

Message: 18
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 14:50:35 -0800 (PST)
From: alan <alan at clueserver.org>
Subject: Re: Fedora C4 dies
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0603281450130.24332 at blackbox.fnordora.org>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed

On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, Jim Douglas wrote:

> Fedora freezes and I'm not sure why

I would think Fedora C4 would explode.

-- 
"Remember there is a big difference between kneeling down and bending
over." - Frank Zappa

------------------------------

Message: 19
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 14:53:14 -0800
From: "M.K" <webfreelancers at gmail.com>
Subject: Boot Loader Recovery
To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID:
	<5e01ea6d0603281453h4ebfb95av3ae27a036f4d91ed at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

How can I recover boot loader.

Massoud
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20060328/de0e2ec9/attachment.html

------------------------------

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list at redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 25, Issue 368
********************************************