any suggestions to choose cool programs to edit files?
Guy Fraser
guy at incentre.net
Tue May 2 16:04:04 UTC 2006
On Fri, 2006-28-04 at 21:52 -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 22:01 -0400, Dan wrote:
>
> > I use gedit for all my HTML, CSS, and PHP editing needs, once the file
> > has the proper extension (.html, .css, .php, etc) it comes up with very
> > excellent (though not flawless) syntax highlighting. Quick, easy,
> > universal. It's better to learn the coding than to let a frontend come
> > up with its own often messy code anyway.
>
> I agree - that's why I use emacs + auctex for LaTeX and bluefish for
> html. Both of them are text editors that (imho) happen to be better than
> gedit for their respective purposes.
Nirvana Editor {nedit} is my preference for GUI text editing, vim
for console text editing. Emacs is powerful but it's complex keystroke
commands underwhelm me. I have used a ton of different console based
text editors over the last few decades and emacs is the most convoluted
I can remember. There were worse editors, but none that I can remember
that used such complicated command syntax. I used to use pico for
quick edits, and vi for all the tricky stuff, but since nedit can do
both and all the machine I work with have enough power and bandwidth
to run nedit over ssh forwarded X, it is what I prefer, but sometimes
I still use vi, for quick jobs.
For newbies who are patient and have lots of time, emacs would be a
good thing to learn. If you are looking for an easy to use powerful
text editor nedit is great and has many more features than gedit.
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list