wlan0 device not present FC5 x86_64
Toad
keepertoad at verizon.net
Sat May 6 23:23:19 UTC 2006
> Toad <keepertoad at verizon.net> wrote:
>
> >Unable to get ndiswrapper to work on 64 bit kernel. Works a treat on
> >smp kernels.
> >
> >lspci shows hardware present.
> > 05:06.0 Network controller: RaLink Ralink RT2500 802.11G
> >Cardbus/mini-PCI (rev 01)
> >
> >lsmod shows ndiswrapper.ko loaded.
> >
> >ndiswrapper shows hardware present:
> >[keepertoad at office ~]$ ndiswrapper -l
> >Installed drivers:
> >rt2500 driver installed, hardware present
> >
> >Driver used is w2k/xp 32 bit. WinXP 64 bit driver results in hard
> lock
> >requiring hardware reset.
> >
> >service network restart responds with "wlan0 not present
> delaying...."
> >
> >ifcfg-wlan0 is identical to known good config for smp kernels. Have
> >tried several versions of ndiswrapper including 1.15 with same
> result.
> >
> >Have tried 2054 and 2096 64 bit kernels with same result.
> >
> >FWIW, CentOS 4.3 64 bit kernels give same result. Yet, it works
> without
> >a hitch on 32 bit kernels and 32 bit smp kernels.
> >
> >Would appreciate any suggestions. Have Googled for hours without
> >finding anything productive. Thanks in advance.
> >
> >bj
> >
> >Fedora Core 5, Linux 2.6.16-1.2111_FC5smp athlon 14:31:12 up 4 min, 2
> >users, load average: 0.49, 0.85, 0.41
> >
> Bad news. Your choices are:
>
> 1) Run a 32-bit version of FC and hope the Windoze 32 bit driver
> works.
> 2) Figure out how to make the 64 bit Windoze driver work with FC 64
> bit.
> 3) Try to find a native Linux driver that works with your existing
> wireless NIC.
> 4) Looks like its a mini-PCI card so you could try a different NIC by
> swapping cards.
>
> I'm running FC4 64bit on an HP laptop and did a bunch of digging last
> summer when I was attempting to make that combination work. The
> Windoze
> driver must match the word size of the Linux kernel for ndiswrapper
> to
> work (both 32 bit or both 64 bit). Could be things have changed
> since
> then but I doubt it. You might want to look around for a different
> version of the Windoze driver (e.g., if this is a laptop, from the
> laptop manufacturer) or, conversely, a plain vanilla driver from the
> card manufacturer and see if it makes any difference.
>
> Cheers,
> Dave
Thanks much. Was afraid of that.:-(
bj
Fedora Core 5, Linux 2.6.16-1.2111_FC5smp athlon 18:21:04 up 3:54, 2
users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list