fc5: install everything?
Eugen Leitl
eugen at leitl.org
Tue May 9 03:38:13 UTC 2006
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 01:19:23PM -0400, Mark Haney wrote:
> Good luck with that. I have a SUSE box that has virtually nothing
> installed by default. You think Fedora's installation is sparse? I was
I can't confirm that data point. SuSE installs are usually eclectic.
> amazed at the total lack of packages installed in SUSE. Really, it's a
> total joke to work on that server. It has KDE /and/ GNOME installed (on
You're talking about a server, I notice.
> a /server/ no less) and yet I had to install the sysstat packages along
> with ntpd and about 3 or 4 others just to make the server really
> manageable. The SUSE install is just silly. The Fedora installer is at
> least more /sane/ than most other installers I've seen or used.
I disagree. I'm still not done with pulling the packages in manually.
People, this sucks.
> But it seems rather childish to switch distros just for that. Kind of
> like taking your ball and going home, eh?
I don't like the sentiment behind above sentence. Yes, I try and run
whatever the fuck I damn please. It broadens the horizont. It allows
me to get work done quicker. Been SuSE, done that, and "install everything"
is a sufficient reason to switch distros.
--
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20060509/50f601af/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list