spambayes
Justin Zygmont
jzygmont at solarflow.net
Tue May 9 20:52:41 UTC 2006
On Tue, 9 May 2006, Claude Jones wrote:
> On Tue May 9 2006 1:38 pm, Justin Zygmont wrote:
>> Are you able to tell if its much more effective than
>> spamassassin? I get spam coming through spamassassin with a
>> 0.0 score!
>
> I've never taken the time to learn how to configure spamassassin
> properly, so I'm not a good judge. With default install
> settings, I did often note that when I had both spamassassin and
> spambayes as filters, that many messages were let through as low
> percentage by spamassassin, but were trapped by Spambayes. I
> don't know if that's much of a test, however.
spamassassin is easy, I just have procmail pipe it to spamd like this:
:0fw
| spamc
:0 H
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
/dev/null
if you still get spam, just view the email headers and se what the score
was. I was suprised to find some major spam messages coming through with
a 0.0 score. Its a tough problem to beat sometimes..
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list