Dealing with 94 rpmnew files on new FC4 install after yum update
Paul Howarth
paul at city-fan.org
Fri May 5 12:24:01 UTC 2006
On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 05:19 -0700, Roger wrote:
> Paul Howarth wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 15:13 -0700, Roger wrote:
> >
> >> I have just installed FC4 on a new PC and ran yum update. The yum
> >> update created 94 .rpmnew files. Most of these end with .conf.rpmnew
> >> and the others end with /config/xxxxx.rpmnew.
> >>
> >> I understand these to be application configuration files that were not
> >> installed by yum because there may have been local customizations. In
> >> normal circumstances, I should review each .rpmnew file against its
> >> counterpart and determine if if the configuration files can be swapped
> >> by renaming or if the .rpmnew file must first be edited. However, at
> >> least a few of the .rpmnew files seem to be binary and I do not know the
> >> function of each application that has an .rpmnew file.
> >>
> >> Because this is a new installation (I have customized my monitor
> >> settings and made a static IP address), a guess is that I just want all
> >> the .rpmnew files installed -- and maybe the existing files renamed to
> >> .rpmold just in case. Is there an installation option that I missed or
> >> is there a cleanup script somewhere to deal with this problem? Would
> >> use of smart (or apt) instead of yum have resulted in fewer problems?
> >>
> >
> > Are you by any chance using x86_64 and are many of these files
> > associated with packages that you have both .x86_64 and .i386 versions
> > installed? A common cause of spurious .rpmnew file generation is when
> > multiple packages own the same config file (as is the case described
> > above, and also for example /etc/vimrc).
> >
> > Paul.
> >
> >
> Yes, I am using x86_64 and the rpmnew files seem to be consistent with
> packages that have .i386 versions. I tried removing a few
> (alsa-lib.i386, apr.i386, and SDL.i386) and yum showed no dependencies
> and removed them. When I entered a remove command for the x86_64
> counterparts, yum showed many dependencies so I did not remove them.
>
> So now the question is why do I have these .386 versions and is it a
> good idea to remove them all?
I suspect they were installed by anaconda but other than that I can't
say much; I don't currently have an x86_64 box myself so I'm not up on
the gory details of what's needed and what's not.
> I should note that I am trying to install MythTV and after the initial
> yum update I added atrpms as a yum repository. atrpms seems to be a bit
> flakey (sometimes there and sometimes not), but I think all the rpmnew
> files predated my adding atrpms as a repository. I could do a clean
> install again to verify that as I am having trouble getting lirc to
> install correctly.
What problems are you having exactly?
Paul.
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list