[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: fc5: install everything?

Benjamin Franz wrote:
On Tue, 9 May 2006, Rahul Sundaram wrote:

On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 14:25 -0600, Tony Heaton wrote:
On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 01:40 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:

Its not possible or efficient for developers and designers to read all
the mails in the fedora-list to gather feedback.


This is your regular post with regards to user input.

Yes and it is unfortunate that the point still hasnt got through to

 We get the point
that developers don't care what users think or want.  Don't just tell us
to post to the devel list, they are the same developers and have the
same attitude over there.

There is no question of attitude. Use bugzilla for bug reports. If you
dont care enough to file a bug report, dont complain about bugs. Dont
expect developers to read every single mail on this high traffic list to
gather feedback. Use the infrastructure provided explicitly for it.



"DUPLICATE of 186007" "CLOSED"

"DUPLICATE of 186007" "CLOSED"

Any other suggestions for getting the developer's attention that won't result in it just getting CLOSED as NOTABUG?

It is un-useful to say 'use bugzilla' when the only response there is to CLOSE it as NOTABUG.

It is practically useless to use Bugzilla for proposals like "Everything Installs without a "Reporter satisfied" type of feature where bugs can only be closed when the reporter is satisfied with the problem reported.

Bugzilla does not have a customer satisfied feature. Therefore it is useless for this sort of request.


Plate voltage too low on demodulator tube

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]