Good Bye FC5
Karl Larsen
k5di at zianet.com
Thu May 11 14:48:37 UTC 2006
Johnny wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 07:20:44AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
>
>> Karl Larsen wrote:
>>
>>> I upgraded to FC5 because it was claimed that it is
>>> better. But some of my best "legacy" software in X-windows looks
>>> diffirent and does not work well.
>>>
>> Without mentioning any details (what software? what problems?),
>> no-one can/will fix it.
>>
>
> I can't speak for Karl, but I've also noticed quite a few regressions
> in FC5. In the past I've always thought that on balance, each release
> of Fedora was better than the last, even if there are a few changes
> that I wasn't fond of. FC5 is different.
>
> - Lack of an "install everything" option requires maintaining a
> list of all the stuff that has to be installed after completing
> the initial installation, so that if I want to do another
> install, or an install of FC6 I'll be able do do so quickly.
>
> - The xorg radeon driver no longer works with two display heads.
> Resolving this requires installing the evil kernel-tainting
> proprietary ATI driver.
>
> - The epiphany web broser requires dbus, and so is no longer a
> network app, but one that can only be run from the local
> console.
>
> - The pwc (Phillips Web Camera) driver loads, but the output of
> the Logitec web camera can't be displayed in either TVtime or
> xawtv.
>
> - gnome-screensaver is lame (too few hacks, unconfigurable) and
> buggy (locks the screen at inappropriate times).
>
> - The nautilus button-3 menu doesn't offer a terminal. The
> nautilus-open-terminal package adds one, but it's in the middle
> of the menu where it's less convenient, and it always opens the
> terminal on display :0.0, even when used from another display.
>
I solved that by accident Johnny, I slid the application control
from the list to the top where it's always available. Took a minute.
But I agree with all else including my problems with FC5....
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list