FC5 xorg and dual head
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
Sun May 14 17:48:26 UTC 2006
On Sun, 2006-05-14 at 12:23, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> >
> > Actually it's not obvious at all that a libstdc++ should
> > change it's interfaces on each release. Isn't it supposed
> > to implement a standard set some time ago? It's also not
>
> Not so long ago that compilers won't continue to evolve toward compliance
> for a while. Also, the API is set by the standard, not the ABI. But
> it's the ABI that matters when linking. If structures change layout or
> name-mangling conventions change, you have a problem even if no changes
> are needed in the your source. The lib in question is from gcc-3.3. The
> current compilers for FC are gcc-4.x, so ABI changes shouldn't be
> surprising.
I guess that depends on your expectations. Sun claims
to run binaries from Solaris 8 on Solaris 10. Are they
using black magic or just doing things right?
> > obvious that needed compatibility libraries would be
> > omitted from a normal install.
>
> They aren't ommitted if you've installed something that depends on them
> from an RPM that properly indicates the dependency.
That requires a rather closed system, doesn't it? What if
you want to run something that packager didn't provide? It
just seems odd for standard libraries to not be available.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list