hosts.deny vs iptables

CodeHeads codeheads at gmail.com
Wed May 24 17:30:30 UTC 2006


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 24 May 2006 10:42:02 -0500 Bruno Wolff III <bruno at wolff.to> wrote:

> On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 22:54:34 -0700,
>   jdow <jdow at earthlink.net> wrote:
> > 
> > In other words, is there any reason you cannot use both? I use both.
> 
> Complexity, performance.
> Those aren't big hurdles, but for cases where tcpwrappers provides little
> benefit, it may not be worth it.
> 

I use this machine for the web only, so IPTables would be the best bet,
right??  I most likely will use both though.

Will
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEdJg2fw3TK8jhZrsRAmXJAJ0aaRbvIyghKWaJRLQDtQi3GG+2swCffQS9
bFKUySaRydEdwF5rYyaJjls=
=XX+B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the fedora-list mailing list