mail server send mail to yahoo bulk folder

[jdow]

From: "James Wilkinson" <fedora at aprilcottage.co.uk>
> Tim wrote (about SpamAssassin flagging .biz domains):
>> Yes, in that message, though in practice the entire message was parsed.
>> Any mention of one gets detected.
>> 
>> My main beef with it has been not that it uses it as a "slightly higher
>> rating", but that it flags it *as* spam, outright.  On the basis that an
>> e-mail came from that domain, or mentions a URI inside it with it, it'd
>> be flagged as BEING spam.  So, completely NON spam e-mail was getting
>> dumped, carte blanche.  Often recipients were completely unaware of
>> this.
> 
> I'm not sure which version of SpamAssassin you're talking about, nor yet
> which rulesets are enabled. But that doesn't sound right -- normally, a
> spam will have to trigger a number of rules before SpamAssassin will
> mark it as spam.
> 
> In the current 3.1.7:
> 
> score BIZ_TLD 1.719 1.169 2.035 2.013
> uri BIZ_TLD                     /\.biz(?::\d+)?(?:\/|$)/i
> describe BIZ_TLD                Contains an URL in the BIZ top-level domain    
> 
> score INFO_TLD 1.373 0.813 1.457 1.273
> uri INFO_TLD                    /\.info(?::\d+)?(?:\/|$)/i
> describe INFO_TLD               Contains an URL in the INFO top-level domain
> 
> The scores vary on whether you've got "network" tests (i.e. blacklists)
> and Bayesian testing turned on.
> 
> By default, one will need a score of 5 before a spam is marked as spam.
> 
> SpamAssassin *doesn't* currently score on mail (allegedly) *from* a .biz
> domain (I've got plenty, thanks, and there's no mention of SpamAssassin
> scoring on it).

http://www.rulesemporium.com/ is your dearest and best friend for adding
additional rules to SpamAssassin.

{^_^}