RAID failure already!!!!!
James Pifer
jep at obrien-pifer.com
Thu Nov 16 15:54:51 UTC 2006
On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 10:33 -0500, Tom Killian wrote:
> > Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
> >this 0 3 64 0 active sync /dev/hdb
> >
> > 0 0 3 64 0 active sync /dev/hdb
> > 1 1 22 0 1 active sync /dev/hdc
> > 2 2 0 0 2 faulty removed
> >
> >Is there anyway to force it to try and reload the array even with the
> >failed device? I'm not getting drive errors on the device any longer. Is
> >the failed device the "dev/hdd" where I missed the leading "/"? Or, is
> >the failed device /dev/hdb?
> >
> >What else can I look at? What other commands should I run?
>
> i think you need something like
>
> mdadm --assemble /dev/md0 /dev/hdb /dev/hdc
>
> you should then be able to add the third device using "mdadm --manage"
> (it's unclear if you need to "start" the array before doing this).
>
Yeah, tried that. It tries for a few seconds, then I get:
[root at storage ~]# mdadm --assemble /dev/md0 /dev/hdb /dev/hdc
mdadm: /dev/md0 assembled from 1 drive - not enough to start the array.
If I cat /proc/mdstat
[root at storage ~]# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities :
md0 : inactive hdc[1] hdb[0]
312581632 blocks super non-persistent
unused devices: <none>
James
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list