SElinux and speed issues
Tim
ignored_mailbox at yahoo.com.au
Thu Oct 5 06:35:51 UTC 2006
Rob Brown-Bayliss:
>> Hi, some time ago, maybe a year of so I saw a post some where
>> suggesting that disabling selinux would improve the speed of gnome
>> (cant recall weather it was fedora specific or not) and I did and yes
>> things (most notably menus and window opening and closing) were
>> faster...
Daniel J Walsh:
> I think this is a red herring. I can think of no reason why XWindows
> would run faster with SELinux disabled. SELinux only effects
> performance when an Access control decision is being made by the
> kernel. XWindows should not be going through the kernel for an access
> check.
I'm not so sure. Gnome isn't X. Gnome is an application (or set of
applications). I'd reckon that it's operation would be subject to
SELinux as much as any others.
I have noticed SELinux be a slowdown on some machines, though it's ages
since I tried that test to remember which things it was obvious with.
--
(Currently running FC4, but testing FC5, if that's important.)
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.
I read messages from the public lists.
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list