[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

RE: Intel(r) CoreT2 Duo Processors"



Only my opinion here, but discs are always the slowest part of the system as
a general rule. The Dell Inspiron 2200 I'm writing this on is slower than
the Vaio my Dad uses even though the Vaio has a slower processor. He's got a
SATA hard drive in that little laptop. My Dell is only a ATA100 5400RPM
drive.

You've got to get it off the disc before anything else can happen...


Matt Beals
Consultant
Enfocus Certified Trainer, Markzware Recognized Trainer
(206) 618-2537 - cell
(720) 367-3869 - fax
mailto:matt mattbeals com

Come visit me at:
http://www.mattbeals.com
http://www.actionlistexchange.net
http://www.mattbeals.com/blog/

Friends don't let friends write HTML emails
 
-----Original Message-----
From: fedora-list-bounces redhat com [mailto:fedora-list-bounces redhat com]
On Behalf Of Dotan Cohen
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 11:31 AM
To: For users of Fedora Core releases
Subject: Re: Intel(r) CoreT2 Duo Processors"

On 12/10/06, Rob Brown-Bayliss <uncertain genius gmail com> wrote:
> I was recently thinking about upgrading to a cor duo, but decided not 
> to as my current p42.8 with a gig of ram is fast enough once things 
> are loaded.  I did some experiments and as far as I can tell the 
> loading speed is a disk IO issue, if I upgraded the cpu the disks will 
> still be the bottle neck.

By what method did you determine this? I'd like to run some similar tests.

Dotan Cohen

http://what-is-what.com/what_is/text_editor.html
http://simplesniff.com/

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list redhat com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]