are you using Fedora in a production environment?

Randy Grimshaw rgrimsha at syr.edu
Thu Oct 26 18:17:51 UTC 2006


We have a couple of small but critical linux environments that needed
custom kernels
On the environment using enterprise it is a bit inconvenient but
acceptable.
On the other environment we went with Fedora because the bleeding edge
mods it uses
are much more difficult to build otherwise. As these mods become more
mainstream I am
sure that we will start to unify on enterprise again. The specification
of 'production use'
in your question is intriguing. I would have to say that fedora is very
attractive for early development,
which could lend itself to more situations in the future where bleeding
edge kernel mods are discovered
and considered important for production use.
<><Randy


<><Randall Grimshaw
Room 203 Machinery Hall
Syracuse University
Syracuse, NY   13244
315-443-5779
rgrimsha at syr.edu

>>> mspevack at redhat.com 10/26/2006 1:29:45 PM >>>
Are you using Fedora in a production or live enviornment?  Are you
using 
large deployments of Fedora, in some sort of "critical" capacity?  Do
you 
know someone who is, and will you forward this email to them?

If you are, I want to hear all about it.  I'm trying to gather data for

some Fedora myth-busting exercises, and also to inform some of our 
decision making for Fedora 7.

What's your setup like?

What is it about Fedora that made you choose to use it, as opposed to 
something else?

What works well for you?

What could be better?

etc, etc.  Anything you care to share with me.

Reply on-list, reply to me directly, whatever works best for you.

Thanks,
Max

-- 
Max Spevack
+ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MaxSpevack 
+ gpg key -- http://spevack.org/max.asc 
+ fingerprint -- CD52 5E72 369B B00D 9E9A 773E 2FDB CB46 5A17 CF21

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list at redhat.com 
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list




More information about the fedora-list mailing list