script writen is ash ?? covert ?

[Gregory Machin]

Thanks for the tips I will lookinto them :--).. Have a grate day ..

On 9/6/06, Tod Merley <todbot88 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 9/6/06, Gregory Machin <gregory.machin at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi
> > I have a script writen for ash and want to convert it to bash ...
> > any hints on doing thins ?
> > Many Thanks
> >
> > --
> > Gregory Machin
> >  gregory.machin at gmail.com
> > www.linuxpro.co.za
> > --
> > fedora-list mailing list
> > fedora-list at redhat.com
> > To unsubscribe:
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> >
> >
> Hi Gregory Machin!
>
> I am no expert.
>
> That said I note with interest that ash is Bourn compliant, very
> efficient (as in part of BusyBox for example) and as such should be a
> functionally a sub set of the bash shell.  See links:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almquist_shell
>
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/6.1/postlfs/shells.html
>
> You probably could:
>
> 1. Simply change the first line to reference Bash.
> 2. Download ash (second link) and make it environmentally available.
> 3. Download BusyBox (it is in your initrd) and make an alias for ash
> linking to it.
>
> Oh, silly ideas in the morning.
>
> Good Hunting!
>
> Tod
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>



-- 
Gregory Machin
gregory.machin at gmail.com
www.linuxpro.co.za
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20060906/17d14acf/attachment-0001.htm>