Suggestions for e-mail client:

[Anne Wilson]

On Friday 29 September 2006 09:09, Rob Brown-Bayliss wrote:
> On 9/29/06, Todd Zullinger <tmz at pobox.com> wrote:
> > before viewing.  I never miss seeing someone's large red font or
> > graphical .sig.
>
> Yet we all have to endure your although very secure 19 line text
> siganture...
>
>   ;-)

Do you mean the gpg signature?  If so, yes.  Unlike html this is a security 
feature not a liability.

>
> Honestly, all the html email haters need to get over it, it's not 1991
> any more, we have hard drive space, we have fast cpu's, and we dont
> have to keep every email we recieve (thank the spamers for that
> revelation!)
>
> I get what your saying, ugly fonts and weird colours and dancing
> monkeys, but it's not worth moaning about.  Delete is your friend...
>
You prefer html - that is your privilege.  However many of us prefer not to.  
More important is the fact that most mailing lists specifically ask you *not* 
to use html.  Do as you like for private mail, but please respect the wishes 
of mailing lists.

Anne
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20060929/05a00837/attachment-0001.sig>