fedora core 4: no fd0u1680?
fedoralist at subtropolix.org
fedoralist at subtropolix.org
Sat Sep 30 04:23:17 UTC 2006
Jeff Vian wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 17:24 -0400, fedoralist at subtropolix.org wrote:
>
>>Joe Smith wrote:
>>
>>>fedoralist at subtropolix.org wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>I've been using core 4 for quite some time now and this is the first
>>>>time i've had to think about device nodes. I'd like to mount a floppy
>>>>that's formatted to 1680 density but can't figure out how the device
>>>>nodes work. ...
>>>
>>>
>>>I hate to ask, but did you try it? The fd0...fdn devices are supposed to
>>>auto-detect the actual capacity and density of the disk in the drive.
>>
>>Yup. After reading the udev stuff.
>>
>>[root at apollo ~]# mount -t vfat /dev/fd0 /media/floppy/
>>[root at apollo ~]# ls /media/floppy/
>>?.? 8v??.?? fp??????.?1? ??syslin.ux ???.u??
>>????????.??? }???.?b? f?>?tf??.t?? ????????.?t? ???}????.u}?
>>?.??> ??b?6?t?.??? f!?txf?.? ???????.t?= ???????u
>>?<??@???.??? b??????u.??? ???h.??? ?????!?t.?aq u????u?.???
>>???.??? ??cbt.^?f ?>lu.?hu &?tf??4u.?.? _w??p??.??_
>>??.??? dlinux s.ys? pamsu7f?.>du ?t??< v.?n?
>>0uf???8u.f)? f??bss.??? p??s??.??? t??x?.??x
>>
>
> The 1680 density is NOT a dos/vfat format. IIRC that is a MAC format
> and needs to be mounted as such for proper access.
>
>
Not true. In fact, Microsoft used to use 1680 density for its install
disks. I've no idea if it was ever used for Macs, though. In any case,
it mounts fine on core 3 with -t vfat.
The example i posted above was to show that the disk was not
automagically detected by udev as 1680. That is what i would expect to
see on my core 3 box if i used /dev/fd0 (because it's the wrong density).
core 3:
[root at poseidon ~]# mount -t vfat /dev/fd0u1680 /media/floppy/
works fine.
core 4:
[root at apollo ~]# mount -t vfat /dev/fd0u1680 /media/floppy/
mount: special device /dev/fd0u1680 does not exist
b
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list