Lost my RAID

Justin Piszcz jpiszcz at lucidpixels.com
Fri Sep 15 14:01:45 UTC 2006



On Fri, 15 Sep 2006, Martin Marques wrote:

>
> On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 14:42:16 +0100, Paul Howarth <paul at city-fan.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Someone told me I would have to rebuild the array with mdadm, but I want
>> to know if I would loose data doing so.
>>
>> You should just be able to re-add sdb1 to the array and it'll rebuild in
>> the background. No data loss.
>
> Thats what I'm seeing right now.
>
> Now, the old entry of sdb1 is still in the md0, but with state removed.
>
> (output of mdadm -D /dev/md0)
>
>    Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
>       0       8        1        0      active sync   /dev/sda1
>       1       0        0        -      removed
>
>       2       8       17        1      spare rebuilding   /dev/sdb1
>
>
> Is that OK?
>
> --
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> Lic. Martín Marqués         |   SELECT 'mmarques' ||
> Centro de Telemática        |       '@' || 'unl.edu.ar';
> Universidad Nacional        |   DBA, Programador,
>    del Litoral             |   Administrador
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> -- 
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>

I believe so, that removed entry /should/ go away after /dev/sdb1 
re-enters the array.

Justin.


More information about the fedora-list mailing list