network has gone down again, and I cannot figure out why

David G. Miller dave at davenjudy.org
Thu Sep 28 19:05:13 UTC 2006


dave at davenjudy.org  wrote:

> Also, looking at what logwatch reports, I noticed the following:
>
> Packages Erased:
>    bind-config
> Another WAG but it appears to have been replaced by:
>
> Packages Installed:
>    sane-backends-libs.i386 1.0.18-2.fc5
>    kernel.i686 2.6.17-1.2187_FC5
>    caching-nameserver.i386 30:9.3.2-33.fc5 <-- This
>    libgconf-java.i386 2.12.4-2.fc5
>
Sort of responding to my own post...  Given the above, I found the 
following output from yum today to be quite amusing:

Added 63 new packages, deleted 51 old in 28.11 seconds
Resolving Dependencies
--> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait.
---> Downloading header for bind-config to pack into transaction set.
bind-config-9.3.2-20.FC5. 100% |=========================|  35 kB    
00:00    
---> Package bind-config.i386 30:9.3.2-20.FC5 set to be updated
--> Running transaction check
--> Processing Dependency: bind = 30:9.3.2-20.FC5 for package: bind-config
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Missing Dependency: bind = 30:9.3.2-20.FC5 is needed by package 
bind-config
Thu Sep 28 12:50:31 MDT 2006
[root at spindle ~]# rpm -q bind
bind-9.3.2-33.fc5
[root at spindle ~]# rpm -q bind-config
package bind-config is not installed

Looks like some part of FC5 still thinks bind-config is needed.  I have 
a funny feeling I'll have to figure out why or yum updates will fail on 
bind-config dependencies until I do.

Cheers,
Dave

-- 
Politics, n. Strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles.
-- Ambrose Bierce




More information about the fedora-list mailing list