[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Suggestions for e-mail client:

On Friday 29 September 2006 19:38, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 10:13 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > > Yet we all have to endure your although very secure 19 line text
> > > siganture...
> > >
> > >   ;-)
> >
> > Do you mean the gpg signature?  If so, yes.  Unlike html this is a
> > security feature not a liability.
> How much of a feature is having your mail program do some extra
> work to report this - on the message I'm replying to:
> The signature of this message cannot be verified, it
> may have been altered in transit.
> gpg: armor header: Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
> gpg: Signature made Fri 29 Sep 2006 04:13:56 AM CDT using DSA key ID
> BFE7357F
> gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
> It doesn't give me any warm fuzzies...
Today 10:13:51
Message was signed by cannewilson tiscali co uk (Key ID: 0x90502F32BFE7357F).
The signature is valid and the key is ultimately trusted.

I don't know why you can't find it - it's on several keyservers to my 


Attachment: pgppPVOVgOWwD.pgp
Description: PGP signature

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]