Announcing Fedora 7 Test 3 (6.92)

[Kevin Kempter]

On Sunday 01 April 2007 11:37:51 pm Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Todd Zullinger wrote:
> > One downside of just grabbing the boot.iso and installing is that
> > there is no signature for that file (or the others in the images/ dir
> > of the Fedora os tree.  I asked about this on the devel list last week
> > but didn't get much in the way of replies.
>
> With the merge of core and extras, the traffic on fedora-devel is a bit
> insane.  Guess that's just the pain of growing up. Finding a good
> subject is essential. I just looked up your post and it wasn't
> particularly clear to me. If you don't attention in the first post might
> as well as try again after a few days or file a report if that's a
> (potential" bug. Bug reports get assigned to specific folks and ignoring
> them is harder.
>
> > It seems to me that starting the OS install from a bootable file that
> > cannot be easily verified[1] is a problem that shouldn't exist.  All
> > of the packages Fedora pushes are gpg signed, as are the full .iso
> > images.  I've not looked at the anaconda source to see if gpg checking
> > is enabled during installation, but I would think (hope) that it would
> > (should) be.
> >
> > Do you see this as a problem Rahul?  I think it is and would like to
> > see it corrected but I'm not sure where to take it.  I may end up
> > opening a bug about it some afternoon, just so it doesn't go away
> > (assuming there isn't one opened already).
>
> Yep, that's a issue. File a bug report against the "distribution"
> component. Jesse Keating or Bill Nottingham should be looking into that.
>
> Rahul

Hi List;

Is FC7, Test 3 available with a KDE desktop? I've read some talk about KDE 
going away, KDE moving to a separate Install DVD, etc.. Not sure what the 
real status/direction is for KDE. plus I'd like to test FC7.

Thanks in advance for any help/direction.