view function of bind 9

[edwardspl at ita.org.mo]

Hello Tim,

There are two of DNS Server machines ( Mater and Salve ).
So, I need to config the DNS ( include the view function and Master /
Salve ) as the following ( SURE ) :

1, Transfer Master Internal Zone file to Salve Internal Zone.
2, Transfer Master External Zone file to Salve External Zone.

Do you think may it to do the following :

1, Transfer Master Internal Zone file to Salve External Zone.
2, Transfer Master External Zone file to Salve Internal Zone.

PS : Internal Zone use Private IP ( For Clients ) , External Zone use Public ( For Internet Servers ), right ?

Tim wrote:

>On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 15:07 +0800, edwardspl at ita.org.mo wrote:
>  
>
>>Would you mind to help as the following ?
>>
>>For view and ( master / salve ) problem...
>>How to config the DNS as the following :
>>1, Transfer Master Internal Zone file to Salve Internal Zone.
>>2, Transfer Master External Zone file to Salve External Zone.
>>    
>>
>
>Umm, why would you be doing this?  You hold DNS records as either a
>master or a slave, not both.  And you can't have a slave server without
>a master server.
>
>If you're simply changing a previously configured master server over to
>being a slave server of another master, you change your named config
>files so the "files" part for those zones are now a slave instead of a
>master type, you specify a filename with "slaves/" in front of it, and
>you specify the address for the master server(s).  The slave server will
>fetch the zone records (the zone file) from the master server itself,
>and you can delete the previous master zone files from this server.
>
>e.g. You'd change something like:
>
>zone "1.168.192.in-addr.arpa" {
>        type master;
>        file  "1.168.192.in-addr.arpa.zone";
>};
>
>Over to something like:
>
>zone "1.168.192.in-addr.arpa" {
>        type slave;
>        file  "slaves/1.168.192.in-addr.arpa.zone";
>        masters { 192.168.1.2; };
>};
>
>But it does sound like you're mixing things up in ways that you
>shouldn't.
>
>  
>
>>PS: Due to the domain_name is the same as Internal / External ! 
>>    
>>
>
>I don't see how "due" is an appropriate word in that sentence.  Of
>course the domain name is the same, inside and out, if you're using
>views.  That's the point of views.
>
>  
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20070406/22355a4a/attachment-0001.htm>